Allmond review: pricing, features & alternatives
Ranked #60Scan-metered tracker across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity in 67+ countries, every feature on every plan from $29.
Our verdict
Allmond's honesty is its selling point: one metered unit, every feature on every plan, four engines and 67+ countries from $29. The cost of that honesty is cadence. Weekly or monthly scans suit a multi-market brand checking direction, not a team that needs to know what changed yesterday. Neither Google AI surface is covered. Use it for cheap breadth. For daily real-UI monitoring, crawler logs, AI-referred conversions and publishing, Promptwatch is the platform that publishes those.
Best for: Brands and agencies tracking several countries or clients on a weekly cadence who want every feature unlocked at the entry price and can live without daily runs.
Allmond (allmond.app) sells scans, not features. A scan is one prompt on one LLM in one country, and every plan unlocks the whole product: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity, 67+ countries, unlimited projects and prompts, a 0 to 100 visibility score, competitor tracking, full response and citation access, shareable reports with custom CTAs and scheduled weekly or monthly runs. The homepage reports 500+ brands and the service is operated by Quoleady OÜ in Estonia.
Starter is $29/mo for 240 scans and 500 citation checks. Growth is $99/mo for 825 scans and 2,000 citation checks. Pro is $199/mo for 1,660 scans and 5,000 citation checks. All three work out to about $0.12 a scan, and one-time scan packs are available mid-month. The 14-day trial needs no card.
The scan model rewards weekly or monthly tracking of many markets and punishes daily runs. Allmond does not publish crawler logs, conversion tracking or content publishing, which is where Promptwatch's platform extends the picture.
Scans, not seats or features
allmond.app/pricing (reviewed 2026-09-12). Starter is $29 a month for 240 scans and 500 citation checks. Growth is $99 for 825 scans and 2,000 citation checks. Pro is $199 for 1,660 scans and 5,000 citation checks. Each works out to roughly $0.12 per scan. A scan is one prompt on one LLM in one country per run, so the page's own example, 2 projects x 50 prompts x 4 LLMs x 2 countries, is 800 scans a run and lands on Growth for a monthly schedule.
Every plan includes all LLM providers (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity), 67+ countries, unlimited projects and prompts, the visibility score, shareable reports, scheduled weekly or monthly tracking, competitor tracking, full response access and outreach URLs. The 14-day trial requires no card, and one-time scan packs can be added without changing plan. Allmond is a service of Quoleady OÜ, Estonia.
Breadth on a budget, and the ceiling
If your question is how visible are we in Germany, France and the US across four engines, Allmond answers it cheaply and shows the exact responses and the URLs cited, which doubles as an outreach list. Shareable reports with your own call to action make it a low-effort client deliverable for agencies.
The ceiling is cadence and depth. Weekly is the fastest published schedule, Google AI Overviews and AI Mode are not covered, and there is no API on the pricing page. Below the answer there is nothing: no crawler logs, no crawl-to-citation path, no conversion tracking and no publishing. Promptwatch publishes real-UI monitoring across a longer engine list, Agent Analytics with named CDN integrations, visitor analytics with conversions and Content Agents to Webflow, Framer, and WordPress.
Allmond pricing
| Plan | Price | What you get |
|---|---|---|
| Trial | 14 days free | No card required |
| Starter | $29/mo | 240 scans, 500 citation checks, all features |
| Growth | $99/mo | 825 scans, 2,000 citation checks, all features |
| Pro | $199/mo | 1,660 scans, 5,000 citation checks, all features |
How Allmond compares
| Tool | Category | Pricing | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allmond (#60) | AI visibility tracker | From $29/mo | Brands and agencies tracking several countries or clients on a weekly cadence who want every feature unlocked at the entry price and can live without daily runs. |
| Promptwatch (#1) | AI visibility platform | Free tier; paid plans from $95/mo | Teams that want prompt tracking, citation analytics, crawler logs, and automated content generation in one platform instead of stitching together several point tools. |
| Rankscale (#25) | AI visibility tracker | From $20/mo | Technical marketers who want the widest engine coverage per dollar and will tolerate credit math and a fast-changing UI. |
| LLM Pulse (#26) | AI visibility tracker | From €49/mo | Small teams and agencies that want transparent self-serve pricing and whole-team access without seat fees — at weekly cadence. |
Key features
- ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity on every plan; 67+ countries for geographic granularity
- Unlimited projects and prompts; scans are the only metered unit (prompts x LLMs x countries per run)
- Visibility score 0 to 100 based on position and context; competitor tracking; full AI responses with source citations and outreach URLs
- Scheduled weekly or monthly tracking; shareable reports with custom CTAs
- 14-day free trial, no card; one-time scan packs and upgrades mid-month
Frequently asked questions
Can Allmond track daily?
The pricing page lists scheduled tracking as weekly or monthly. There is no daily cadence stated. Promptwatch monitors the real chat interfaces, not just APIs.
Does Allmond cover Google AI Overviews?
No. The LLM providers listed are ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity. Google AI Overviews and AI Mode are not on the plan.
Does Allmond have crawler logs or conversion tracking?
Not on this listing. It tracks answers, citations and competitors. It does not publish AI crawler logs or visitor analytics that attribute AI-referred sessions to conversions. Promptwatch publishes both.
Best Allmond alternatives
See allFull-stack AI visibility platform combining prompt tracking, citation analytics, AI crawler logs, visitor analytics, and automated content generation.
Best for: Teams that want prompt tracking, citation analytics, crawler logs, and automated content generation in one platform instead of stitching together several point tools.
- One of the few platforms combining prompt tracking, citation analytics, crawler logs, and visitor analytics in a single stack
- Content Agents can plan, write, and publish content on a schedule, not just flag gaps
AI rank tracking with site audits scored for generative-engine readability.
Best for: Technical marketers who want the widest engine coverage per dollar and will tolerate credit math and a fast-changing UI.
- Audit layer at a tracker price
- Very accessible entry cost
Bootstrapped Barcelona tracker with honest pricing, unlimited seats, and MCP on every plan.
Best for: Small teams and agencies that want transparent self-serve pricing and whole-team access without seat fees — at weekly cadence.
- Genuinely transparent: published pricing, 14-day trial, unlimited seats everywhere
- Bootstrapped and profitable — no VC burn-rate risk, unlike much of the category
YC-backed tracker with daily 600-prompt volume and a built-in content engine.
Best for: Teams that want maximum daily answer volume plus content production in one tool — and accept betting on a lightly-funded startup with zero review footprint.
- Best per-answer economics in the category: ~108,000 answers/mo at $599
- Daily cadence on everything, not weekly